Advertisement
Original article|Articles in Press

The impact of tumor location on the value of lymphadenectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Published:February 21, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2023.02.013

      Abstract

      Background

      The therapeutic role of lymphadenectomy (LND) for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) patients remains ill-defined. We sought to analyze the therapeutic value of LND relative to tumor location and preoperative lymph node metastasis (LNM) risk.

      Methods

      Patients who underwent curative-intent hepatic resection of ICC between 1990 and 2020 were included from a multi-institutional database. Therapeutic LND (tLND) was defined as LND that harvested ≥3 lymph nodes.

      Results

      Among 662 patients, 178 (26.9%) individuals received tLND. Patients were categorized into central type ICC (n = 156, 23.6%) and peripheral type ICC (n = 506, 76.4%). Central type harbored multiple adverse clinicopathologic factors and worse overall survival (OS) compared with peripheral type (5-year OS, central: 27.0% vs. peripheral: 47.2%, p < 0.001). After consideration of preoperative LNM risk, patients with central type and high-risk LNM who underwent tLND survived longer than individuals who did not (5-year OS, tLND: 27.9% vs. non-tLND: 9.0%, p = 0.001), whereas tLND was not associated with better survival among patients with peripheral type ICC or low-risk LNM. The therapeutic index of hepatoduodenal ligament (HDL) and other regions was higher in central type than in peripheral type, which was more pronounced among high-risk LNM patients.

      Conclusions

      Central type ICC with high-risk LNM should undergo LND involving regions beyond the HDL.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to HPB
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Singal A.K.
        • Vauthey J.N.
        • Grady J.J.
        • Stroehlein J.R.
        Intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma--frequency and demographic patterns: thirty-year data from the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center.
        J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2011; 137: 1071-1078https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-010-0971-z
        • Khan S.A.
        • Taylor-Robinson S.D.
        • Toledano M.B.
        • Beck A.
        • Elliott P.
        • Thomas H.C.
        Changing international trends in mortality rates for liver, biliary and pancreatic tumours.
        J Hepatol. 2002; 37: 806-813https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-8278(02)00297-0
        • Tsilimigras D.I.
        • Sahara K.
        • Wu L.
        • Moris D.
        • Bagante F.
        • Guglielmi A.
        • et al.
        Very early recurrence after liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: considering alternative treatment approaches.
        JAMA Surg. 2020; 155: 823-831https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1973
        • Yamamoto M.
        • Takasaki K.
        • Yoshikawa T.
        Lymph node metastasis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
        Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1999; 29: 147-150https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/29.3.147
        • Zhang X.F.
        • Xue F.
        • Dong D.H.
        • Weiss M.
        • Popescu I.
        • Marques H.P.
        • et al.
        Number and station of lymph node metastasis after curative-intent resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma impact prognosis.
        Ann Surg. 2021; 274: e1187-e1195https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003788
        • Bagante F.
        • Gani F.
        • Spolverato G.
        • Xu L.
        • Alexandrescu S.
        • Marques H.P.
        • et al.
        Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: prognosis of patients who did not undergo lymphadenectomy.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2015; 221: 1031-10340 e1-4https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.09.012
        • Bagante F.
        • Spolverato G.
        • Weiss M.
        • Alexandrescu S.
        • Marques H.P.
        • Aldrighetti L.
        • et al.
        Assessment of the lymph node status in patients undergoing liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: the new eighth edition AJCC staging system.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2018; 22: 52-59https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3426-x
        • Weber S.M.
        • Jarnagin W.R.
        • Klimstra D.
        • DeMatteo R.P.
        • Fong Y.
        • Blumgart L.H.
        Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: resectability, recurrence pattern, and outcomes.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2001; 193: 384-391https://doi.org/10.1016/s1072-7515(01)01016-x
        • Bridgewater J.
        • Galle P.R.
        • Khan S.A.
        • Llovet J.M.
        • Park J.W.
        • Patel T.
        • et al.
        Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
        J Hepatol. 2014; 60: 1268-1289https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2014.01.021
        • Choi S.B.
        • Kim K.S.
        • Choi J.Y.
        • Park S.W.
        • Choi J.S.
        • Lee W.J.
        • et al.
        The prognosis and survival outcome of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma following surgical resection: association of lymph node metastasis and lymph node dissection with survival.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2009; 16: 3048-3056https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0631-1
        • Ribero D.
        • Pinna A.D.
        • Guglielmi A.
        • Ponti A.
        • Nuzzo G.
        • Giulini S.M.
        • et al.
        Surgical approach for long-term survival of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis of 434 patients.
        Arch Surg. 2012; 147: 1107-1113https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2012.1962
        • Shimada K.
        • Sano T.
        • Nara S.
        • Esaki M.
        • Sakamoto Y.
        • Kosuge T.
        • et al.
        Therapeutic value of lymph node dissection during hepatectomy in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma with negative lymph node involvement.
        Surgery. 2009; 145: 411-416https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2008.11.010
        • de Jong M.C.
        • Nathan H.
        • Sotiropoulos G.C.
        • Paul A.
        • Alexandrescu S.
        • Marques H.
        • et al.
        Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: an international multi-institutional analysis of prognostic factors and lymph node assessment.
        J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29: 3140-3145https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.35.6519
        • Sahara K.
        • Tsilimigras D.I.
        • Merath K.
        • Bagante F.
        • Guglielmi A.
        • Aldrighetti L.
        • et al.
        Therapeutic index associated with lymphadenectomy among patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: which patients benefit the most from nodal evaluation?.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2019; 26: 2959-2968https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07483-9
        • Umeda Y.
        • Mitsuhashi T.
        • Kojima T.
        • Satoh D.
        • Sui K.
        • Endo Y.
        • et al.
        Impact of lymph node dissection on clinical outcomes of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: inverse probability of treatment weighting with survival analysis.
        J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2022; 29: 217-229https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.1038
        • Tsilimigras D.I.
        • Sahara K.
        • Paredes A.Z.
        • Moro A.
        • Mehta R.
        • Moris D.
        • et al.
        Predicting lymph node metastasis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2021; 25: 1156-1163https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04720-5
        • Aishima S.
        • Oda Y.
        Pathogenesis and classification of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: different characters of perihilar large duct type versus peripheral small duct type.
        J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015; 22: 94-100https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.154
        • Umeda Y.
        • Takagi K.
        • Matsuda T.
        • Fuji T.
        • Kojima T.
        • Satoh D.
        • et al.
        Clinical implications and optimal extent of lymphadenectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter analysis of the therapeutic index.
        Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2022; : 1-11https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12642
        • Amin M.B.
        • Greene F.L.
        • Edge S.B.
        • Compton C.C.
        • Gershenwald J.E.
        • Brookland R.K.
        • et al.
        The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more "personalized" approach to cancer staging.
        CA Cancer J Clin. 2017; 67: 93-99https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21388
        • Zhang X.F.
        • Bagante F.
        • Chen Q.
        • Beal E.W.
        • Lv Y.
        • Weiss M.
        • et al.
        Perioperative and long-term outcome of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma involving the hepatic hilus after curative-intent resection: comparison with peripheral intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
        Surgery. 2018; 163: 1114-1120https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2018.01.001
        • Vitale A.
        • Moustafa M.
        • Spolverato G.
        • Gani F.
        • Cillo U.
        • Pawlik T.M.
        Defining the possible therapeutic benefit of lymphadenectomy among patients undergoing hepatic resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
        J Surg Oncol. 2016; 113: 685-691https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24213
        • Endo Y.
        • Sasaki K.
        • Moazzam Z.
        • Lima H.A.
        • Alaimo L.
        • Guglielmi A.
        • et al.
        Higher tumor burden status dictates the impact of surgical margin status on overall survival in patients undergoing resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2022; : 1-10https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12803-7
        • Sasaki K.
        • Morioka D.
        • Conci S.
        • Margonis G.A.
        • Sawada Y.
        • Ruzzenente A.
        • et al.
        The tumor burden score: a new "Metro-ticket" prognostic tool for colorectal liver metastases based on tumor size and number of tumors.
        Ann Surg. 2018; 267: 132-141https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002064
        • Sasako M.
        • McCulloch P.
        • Kinoshita T.
        • Maruyama K.
        New method to evaluate the therapeutic value of lymph node dissection for gastric cancer.
        Br J Surg. 1995; 82: 346-351https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800820321
        • Ueno H.
        • Mochizuki H.
        • Hashiguchi Y.
        • Ishiguro M.
        • Miyoshi M.
        • Kajiwara Y.
        • et al.
        Potential prognostic benefit of lateral pelvic node dissection for rectal cancer located below the peritoneal reflection.
        Ann Surg. 2007; 245: 80-87https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000225359.72553.8c
        • Yoh T.
        • Cauchy F.
        • Le Roy B.
        • Seo S.
        • Taura K.
        • Hobeika C.
        • et al.
        Prognostic value of lymphadenectomy for long-term outcomes in node-negative intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter study.
        Surgery. 2019; 166: 975-982https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2019.06.025
        • Li D.Y.
        • Zhang H.B.
        • Yang N.
        • Quan Y.
        • Yang G.S.
        Routine lymph node dissection may be not suitable for all intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients: results of a monocentric series.
        World J Gastroenterol. 2013; 19: 9084-9091https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i47.9084
        • Orimo T.
        • Kamiyama T.
        • Mitsuhashi T.
        • Kamachi H.
        • Yokoo H.
        • Wakayama K.
        • et al.
        Impact of tumor localization on the outcomes of surgery for an intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
        J Gastroenterol. 2018; 53: 1206-1215https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-018-1469-8
        • Marubashi S.
        • Gotoh K.
        • Takahashi H.
        • Ohigashi H.
        • Yano M.
        • Ishikawa O.
        • et al.
        Prediction of the postoperative prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC): importance of preoperatively- determined anatomic invasion level and number of tumors.
        Dig Dis Sci. 2014; 59: 201-213https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-013-2894-4
        • Yamashita Y.I.
        • Wang H.
        • Kurihara T.
        • Tsujita E.
        • Nishie A.
        • Imai K.
        • et al.
        Clinical significances of preoperative classification of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: different characteristics of perihilar vs. Peripheral ICC.
        Anticancer Res. 2016; 36: 6563-6569https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.11260
        • Reames B.N.
        • Bagante F.
        • Ejaz A.
        • Spolverato G.
        • Ruzzenente A.
        • Weiss M.
        • et al.
        Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis.
        HPB. 2017; 19: 901-909https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2017.06.008
        • Endo Y.
        • Moazzam Z.
        • Alaimo L.
        • Lima H.A.
        • Munir M.M.
        • Shaikh C.F.
        • et al.
        Predictive risk-score model to select patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma for adjuvant chemotherapy.
        HPB. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2022.10.011
        • Nakamura H.
        • Arai Y.
        • Totoki Y.
        • Shirota T.
        • Elzawahry A.
        • Kato M.
        • et al.
        Genomic spectra of biliary tract cancer.
        Nat Genet. 2015; 47: 1003-1010https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3375
        • Sposito C.
        • Ratti F.
        • Cucchetti A.
        • Ardito F.
        • Ruzzenente A.
        • Di Sandro S.
        • et al.
        Survival benefit of adequate lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing liver resection for clinically node-negative intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
        J Hepatol. 2022; 78: 356-363https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2022.10.021
        • Bagante F.
        • Spolverato G.
        • Weiss M.
        • Alexandrescu S.
        • Marques H.P.
        • Aldrighetti L.
        • et al.
        Surgical management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: impact of lymphadenectomy on peri-operative outcomes.
        World J Surg. 2018; 42: 2551-2560https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4453-1
        • Kobayashi S.
        • Wada H.
        • Tomokuni A.
        • Takahashi H.
        • Gotoh K.
        • Sakon M.
        • et al.
        Invasion category-oriented lymph node metastases of cholangiocarcinoma and the prognostic impact.
        Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020; 405: 989-998https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-01955-3
        • Tokunaga M.
        • Ohyama S.
        • Hiki N.
        • Fukunaga T.
        • Inoue H.
        • Yamada K.
        • et al.
        Therapeutic value of lymph node dissection in advanced gastric cancer with macroscopic duodenum invasion: is the posterior pancreatic head lymph node dissection beneficial?.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2009; 16: 1241-1246https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0345-4
        • Kuroda H.
        • Sakao Y.
        • Mun M.
        • Motoi N.
        • Ishikawa Y.
        • Nakagawa K.
        • et al.
        Therapeutic value of lymph node dissection for right middle lobe non-small-cell lung cancer.
        J Thorac Dis. 2016; 8: 795-802https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2016.03.30
        • Kim S.H.
        • Han D.H.
        • Choi G.H.
        • Choi J.S.
        • Kim K.S.
        Extent of lymph node dissection for accurate staging in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2022; 26: 70-76https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-021-05039-5
        • Zhang X.F.
        • Chen Q.
        • Kimbrough C.W.
        • Beal E.W.
        • Lv Y.
        • Chakedis J.
        • et al.
        Lymphadenectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: has nodal evaluation been increasingly adopted by surgeons over time?A national database analysis.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2018; 22: 668-675https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3652-2